How we Determined
Which Nutritional Supplement was the
Most Suitable
In the late 1990’s, a panel of
12 Doctors, Scientists &
Health
Professionals Headed up by
Lyle
McWilliams,
determined a test
called
“The Blended Standard”
that
they
embedded in the product
rating methodology that is
used in the
guide.
It was published
in his
Comparative Guide to Nutritional
Supplements.
They were as follows...
•1.
Completeness
Does the product contain the
full spectrum of nutrients
listed
in the blended standard and
considered essential for
optimal
health?
2.
Potency
Of those
nutrients in the product, what
percentage are found
at potency levels
meeting or exceeding 50% of the
potency
for those
nutrients in the Blended
Standard?
•3.
Bioavailability
Does the product contain
minerals in their most
bio-available
forms as amino acid chelates or
organic acid complexes?
•4.
Bioavailability of Vit.E
Does the product
contain only the natural
biologically active form of
alpha tocopherol or does the
product use a synthetic form
(where the biological activity
is about ½ [or less] of the
natural Vitamin E)?
•5.
Cardiac Health Support
Does the product
contain Vitamin E, Co-Enzyme Q10,
and magnesium, the three
nutritional components important
to cardiac health?
•6.
Homocysteine Support
Does the product
contain the nutritional triad of
vitamin B6,
B12 and
folic acid at levels that meet
requirements for Optimal Health?
•7.
Bone Health Complex
Does the product contain the
nutrients shown by clinical
studies to be important for
optimal bone health?
•8.
Anti-Oxidant Support
Does the product contain the
important antioxidant triad of
Vit.E, Vit.C and Beta-carotene?
•9.
Glutathione Support
Does the product contain
glutathione to help fight toxins
created by metabolism?
•10.
Metabolic Support
Does the product
contain the nutrients necessary
to help regulate glucose
metabolism and support the
body’s ability to generate,
store and utilise energy?
•11.
Flavonoids & Phenols
Does the product
contain a mixture of
bioflavonoids
(protect cells against oxidative attack)
and phenolic compounds
(free radical protagonist)?
•12.
Liprotropic Factors
Does the product contain the
important lipotropic factors,
choline and inositol
(anti-inflammatory, anti-viral,
anti-bacterial, anti-allergic,
anti-haemorrhagic and
immune enhancing agents)?
•13.
Potential Toxicity
Does the
nutritional supplement contain levels of
Vitamin A and Iron that exceed 100% of
the Blended Standard?
Below are
two popular Australian brands that show
very little nutritional value!
The iodine is
not necessarily bad but it works like
caffeine so you take the supplement, get a
hit,
and think it's
working when it isn't really.
The brand
that rated the top product was
USANA Health Sciences. It rated
73.3%, the nearest competitor was a
clinicians brand from Natural Health
Laboratories. It rates at only 45.1%.
Remarkably this guide has become a
bible to a lot of health
professionals who find it hard to
navigate through the maze of
products available! If they find it
hard...what about the consumer
public. I can't see they have any
hope of determining which is best?
In
fact USANA was
Ranked Number 1 Supplement in
Australia & New Zealand
►Comprehensive,
precisely
balanced supplements
►
►Broad-spectrum
antioxidant protection
►Nutrition
for all generations
(has doses
for adults, teenagers and
children)
Watch the following Video
from Channel
7's Today Tonight
As Health Professionals
discuss USANA Health
Sciences.
And
simply said, that's the reason I
recommend it to all my clients!